How long will Facebook last?

I'm overdue for a blog post here (funny how real life intrudes at times on the virtual one :-).  Someone asked on the Webheads list this morning, how long will Facebook last?  This person was trying to decide if she should delete her professional contacts from her Facebook account since she was finding she used it more to stay in touch with friends and family, and her professional contacts in that mix seemed increasingly a mismatch.  So I answered something like this:

How long will Facebook last?  According to the stats cited in its Wikipedia article (the same page also comes up high in a Google search on 'Facebook statistics') growth in use of Facebook was 145% last year in the USA, and in over-55's an astounding 923%.  I don't think it will go away next year or the year after. 

http://www.istrategylabs.com/2010/01/facebook-demographics-and-statistics-report-2010-145-growth-in-1-year/

I went to a TESOL presentation once where a teacher in the UAE was using Facebook with his students and he had a separate account for that apart from his main one.  So I guess it would be possible to maintain two personas, but without that personal touch we wouldn't know about Ruth Vilmi's colorful paintings, that Wesley Fryer almost encountered a tornado at his last presentation, that Serpil Sönmez just got married, or the context from which Carla Arena and Aiden Yeh derive their amazing inspirations with students. ( I got this list from scanning my own Home page in Facebook just now.  These are just a few updates from my professional contacts listed there, so I think you get the idea.)

I think one reason for Facebook's success is that it helps us bridge that gap between our work and social and family lives that used to be studiously, and artificially, kept separate.  We take bridges for granted now, it's human nature to build them, they're generally positive developments. Webheads does this too.  Personal + professional = natural, and thanks to technology we CAN build these bridges now, whereas before digital natives, this was impossible on such a grand scale.  

As an inveterate cat herder I instinctively steer away from trying to drive social media.  It's media, it drives us (The Machine is Using US, right?). So I would advise to accept the way our world has headed, blended learning, blended professional development, blended families and friends. There's no need to build artificial walls unless you really find a problem. A lot of times we assume there will be or could be, but when once we accept that healthy mix of personality and professionalism, it turns out the two often go compatibly hand in hand. 

Of course, don't keep skeletons in your digital closet, but I think there is growing awareness of how to manage that downside. I encountered recently the ameliorating concept of "mutually assured disgrace" where people are learning not to rattle the skeletons in the closets of others since we are all equally vulnerable to inappropriately abusive probes of our digital online artifacts - but for most of us, our digital footprint speaks highly of us, well beyond reproach, and the real issue here is making students aware of the ramifications of similarly maintaining their own web presence.

Accordingly, I haven't had any problem yet, and I find my use of Facebook changing as I use the media.  As one example of this change, check out http://screencast.com/t/NGRlZjMwMDg, where I expressed surprise at finding out about http://www.paper.li in Facebook from Carla Arena's post rather than first on Twitter as I would have up to now expected, and this attracted comments from Michael Coghlan and Jennifer Vershoor, who both concurred with this observation.

The times they are a changing, at an accelerating pace, rapidly approaching Singularity, http://www.kurzweilai.net/articles/art0134.html?printable=1.   Until we reach that point of infinitely altered intelligence (which in Kurtzweil's words, "can manipulate matter and energy to do whatever it wants"), best to go with the flow.

Facing up to Facebook

Heather made a posting to one of the lists I follow in which she said that she was considering using Facebook with her students, and did anyone have any thoughts on how she might do that. Someone was quick to respond with a posting citing a litany of paedophilia encounters on social networking sites. The posting was perhaps meant as a warning about such sites, but was more likely a case of someone passing on something they had seen lately on the topic, though they didn't know much more about it than that.

I responded that this was exactly the reason WHY educators SHOULD be taking an interest in social networking sites like Facebook. Some commonly cited analogies are that you don’t keep scissors out of your classroom, you teach people not to run with them. What if adults 'blocked' streets and tried to keep children from crossing them instead of teaching them HOW to cross them? Sure, the kids would be safe for a while, if a bit ignorant, but eventually they would encounter streets, and they’d have to work out, probably from emulating a seemingly wiser peer, how to cross them.

Kids are encountering Facebook among other social networking sites. They are not going to revert to postcards and letters at this point. Means of communication, literacies, language, conceptions of technology … all evolve and change and there is no forcing a return to a more comprehensible time no matter how convenient that would be for parents and teachers. In fact, if we older folks want to remain relevant to kids, we have to meet them in their space (My Space?). We need to act as guides there. It is our responsibility as parents and teachers, if we wish to have an impact on how this new generation develops, to make an effort to understand what is going on with social networking, even to the point of joining in, and discoursing with people young and old from an informed perspective, offering insights gained from greater experience in life, but understanding that the world changes and those who prosper change with it.

A good guide has to learn the terrain. To be a guide in Facebook you need to get an account. It’s easy and intuitive, though even I balk at installing Super Walls and accepting Vampire Bites. If you’re fortunate enough to have a fervent user in your family or distributed learning network, you might learn how tagging works with photos, or how professionals are using it to network. I found out about the recent Edublog awards ceremony in Second Life through a Facebook announcement, and Curt Bonk has started a Bonkian YouTubian Researchian network (pretty Bonkian alright - Curt, to me, is a 'seemingly wiser peer'). I’ve been teaching a course on multiliteracies for TESOL and we have been using a book written by Stuart Selber. Through another Facebook contact who discovered that Stuart had a Facebook acct and who added him to her friends list, I added Stuart to mine and he accepted. I sense that my next Multiliteracies course is going to have an interesting dimension to it as we now have the possibility of discussing the concepts with the author of the book via Facebook, can’t wait!

Heather made an important point. Apart from suggesting that she get her students started in Facebook (they most likely already ARE started .. Facebook is now what we have to ask students to log out of instead of MSN, as used to be the case a year or two ago.) … but apart from that, letting them get on with it is exactly the point. If you want to hear something interesting listen to Konrad Glogowski’s K-12 Online presentation at http://k12onlineconference.org/?p=166, or what I was actually thinking of, his conversation with Women of Web 2.0 at http://www.edtechtalk.com/node/2661 where he explains how he did just that in his PhD research, got his students blogging and let them go for a month and then researched what they said about their school work. Guess what, they didn’t say ANYthing about the syllabus. BUT (and his students are 8th graders) they wrote cogently and engagingly about what interested them, and they dialoged with one another, and considered audience and argument to a much greater degree than one would expect from more traditional ways of teaching 8th graders.

Konrad cited the work of Ray Oldenburg who coined the term “Third Place” in the context of being not home and not work, but a place of “broader, more creative interaction" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_place (why, when I want to know something, can I invariably find out more about it in Wikipedia? - another social networking site that certain segments of education really need to face up to). Konrad has an interesting blog post on turning classrooms into Third Places: http://www.commun-it.org/community/konradg/weblog/454.html . So what Heather is suggesting then is creating a Third Place that might overlap a little with her class, where students could get away from the ‘work’ place (the ‘second’ place) yet co-mingle the second and third. This is what Konrad did. When he saw that his students were not discoursing on the classroom in their blogs, he started bringing up their blog posts in class, making their postings a part of the discourse of his classroom, as he put it. One of my take-away quotes from listening to that conversation was Konrad’s contention that “writing is a social artifact” – think about it, and then think about Vygotsky and constructivism, and check out what George Siemens says about Connectionism next time you’re on Google.

The lesson for us is that in order to remain relevant to our students, we have to acknowledge their discourse, and absorb it to some extent into our dealings with them. To watch that boat leaving the pier and not make some effort to leap aboard, or reach it, is just going to widen the gap between us and our students.

MEANWHILE - This just in ...

... and regarding my previous posting, feeling experimental, a possible breakthrough in the ongoing saga of achieving long-sought recognition from Technorati that I as a blogger exist. Finally, an email from someone at Technorati apologizing for the long delay in getting back to me but they have made a small adjustment to their system and from now on but not including previous postings (that's fine with me) my blog should start appearing in their listings. No, the trick provided by David Warlick mentioned in the previous post didn't work, but if Technorati has fixed the problem, this posting should. If you find it after a search on one of the tags here, leave me a congratulatory comment!